Honest comparison

Battery Hog vs Stats

Both are free, open-source Mac utilities. Stats is the better broad telemetry dashboard; Battery Hog is the more focused battery investigation for development-heavy workflows.

Different jobs

Stats puts configurable CPU, GPU, memory, disk, network, battery, sensor, and other modules in the menu bar. Battery Hog narrows the surface to a question: what is shortening this unplugged session, and which workload might explain it?

PriorityBattery HogStats
Broad sensor telemetryNot the goalStrong fit
Menu-bar customizationBattery-focusedExtensive modules
Development workload groupingCore featureNot the primary model
Battery history and sleep blockersInvestigation-orientedBroader monitoring context
Thermal alerts with likely workloadCore workflowDifferent focus
Open sourceMITOpen source

Choose Stats if

You want a customizable cockpit for many hardware and operating-system signals, especially persistent menu-bar telemetry.

Choose Battery Hog if

You mainly care about unplugged runtime, development projects, sleep blockers, and an explanation when recent work coincides with rising thermal pressure.

There is no need to pick a winner. Stats can stay your broad monitor while Battery Hog is the focused tool you open for a battery investigation.

Explore Battery Hog on GitHub